Influence of big five personality on TSA of emergency rescue team: a model with dual moderating effects

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.022

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore formation mechanism of TSA for emergency rescue teams, and to clarify influence of personality, individual situation awareness (ISA) and social network relationship on its formation, relationships between these variables were empirically studied. Firstly, 364 senior students from fire command department of China people's Police University, selected as participants, were divided into 40 teams to rescue trapped victims in collapsed buildings after an earthquake, and their ISA and TSA data were collected during this drill. Then, their Big Five personality and daily CND data were acquired by online questionnaires. Finally, a dual regulation model with Openness dimension and neuroticism dimension from Big Five personality as independent variables and ISA and CND as moderating variables was constructed by regression analysis. The results indicate that Openness positively predicts TSA, and the higher Openness a team has, the higher TSA there will be. However, neuroticism negatively predicts TSA, and the lower neuroticism, the higher TSA there will be. Improvement of average ISA can enhance predictive effects of these two factors above while improvement of CND does the opposite.

Key words: emergency rescue, big five personality, team situation awareness (TSA), moderating effect, cooperation network density (CND)

CLC Number:

X928.04

JIANG Hui, WEN Guanqun, WANG Zhenxiong. Influence of big five personality on TSA of emergency rescue team: a model with dual moderating effects[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10): 156-163.

References

[1] SALAS E, PRINCE C, BAKER D P, et al. Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurement and training[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995, 37(1): 123-136.
[2] ENDSLEY M R. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement[C]. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32^nd Annual Meeting, 1998, 32(2): 97-101.
[3] DURSO F T, GRONLUND S D. Situation awareness[M]. New York: Wiley,1999: 283-314.
[4] 王永刚, 陈道刚. 基于结构方程模型的管制员情境意识影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013,23(7): 20-26.
WANG Yonggang, CHEN Daogang. Study on factors influencing air traffic controller's situation awarenessbased on structural equation model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013,23(7): 20-26.
[5] STUBBINGS L, CHABOYER W, MCMURRAY A. Nurses' use of situation awareness in decision-making: an integrative review[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2012, 68(7): 1 443-1 453.
[6] 吴初娜, 曾诚. 场景对驾驶人危险辨识能力评估结果的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018,28(4): 30-35.
WU Chu'na, ZENG Cheng. Effects of scenarios on drivers' hazard perception evaluation result[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018,28(4): 30-35.
[7] ENSLEY M R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems[J]. Human Factors, 1995, 37: 85-104.
[8] SAUS E, JOHNSEN B H, EID J, et al. Who benefits from simulator training: personality and heart rate variability in relation to situation awareness during navigation training[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(4): 1 262-1 268.
[9] FLIN R. Selecting the right stuff: personality and high reliability occupations[M]. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2001: 253-276.
[10] STANTON N A, STEWART R, HARRIS D, et al. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology[J]. Ergonomics, 2006, 49(12/13): 1 288-1 311.
[11] SALMON P M, STANTON N A, WALKER G H, et al. What really is going on? review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2008, 9(4): 297-323.
[12] 陈樊骏, 姜卉. 社会网络关系对团队情境意识影响的实验分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(22): 300-314.
CHEN Fanjun, JIANG Hui. The experimental analysis of the impact of social network on team situation awareness [J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2017, 47(22): 300-314.
[13] 姜卉, 王玉婷. 应急救援团队的个体与团队情境意识: 社会网络关系的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(6): 1 416-1 422.
JIANG Hui, WANG Yuting. Individual and team situation awareness of emergency rescue team: social network relationship as moderator[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2018, 41(6): 1 416-1 422.
[14] MA Jun, LU Jie, ZHANG Guangquan. Team situation awareness measure using semantic utility functions for supporting dynamic decision-making[J]. Soft Computing-A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 2010, 14(12): 1 305-1 316.
[15] COSTA P T, MACCRAE R R. NEO-PI-R professional manual: revised NEO personality and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI).[J]. Psychological Assessment, 1992, 4: 26-42.
[16] BARRICK M R, MOUNT M K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44(1): 1-26.
[17] BARRICK M R, MOUNT M K. Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(1): 111-118.
[18] TETT R P, JACKSON D N, ROTHSTEIN M. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta‐analytic review[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44(4): 703-742.
[19] SALGADO J F. Big five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: a European perspective[J]. Human Performance, 1998, 11(2/3): 271-288.
[20] 白新文, 王二平, 李永娟. 大五人格与绩效: 团队水平的研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(1): 120-125.
BAI Xinwen, WANG Erping, LI Yongjuan.Five-factor model of personality and performance: review of team-level research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2006, 14(1): 120-125.
[21] 朱庆华, 李亮. 社会网络分析法及其在情报学中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2008, 31(2): 179-183.
ZHU Qinghua, LI Liang. Social network analysis method & its application in information science[J].Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2008, 31(2): 179-183.
[22] LIM B C. Do the leader and members make the team? the role of personality and cognitive ability[D]. Maryland:University of Maryland, 2003.
[23] BURT R S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press,1992: 65-67.
[24] 韩忠明, 吴杨, 谭旭升, 等. 社会网络结构洞节点度量指标比较与分析[J]. 山东大学学报:工学版,2014,45(1): 1-8.
HAN Zhongming, WU Yang, TAN Xusheng, et al. Comparison and analysis on measure indexes for structural hole nodes in social network[J]. Journal of Shandong University:Engineering Science, 2014,45(1): 1-8.
[25] ENDSLEY M R. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988: 789-795.
[26] MUNIZ E, STOUT R, BOWERS C, et al. A methodology for measuring team situational awareness: situational awareness linked indicators adapted to novel tasks (SALIENT)[C]. NATO Human Factors and Medicine Panel on Collaborative Crew Performance in Complex Systems, 1998: 20-24.
[27] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制 Ⅲ: 简式版的制定及信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(4): 454-457.
WANG Mengcheng, DAI Xiaoyang, YAO Shuqiao. Development of the Chinese big five personality inventory (CBF-PI) Ⅲ:psychometric properties of CBF-PI Brief Version[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2011, 19(4): 454-457.